From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Dodeka

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Sep 24, 2009
No. 13-09-00237-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 24, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00237-CV

Opinion delivered and filed September 24, 2009.

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on May 25, 2009. On July 7, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Dodeka

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Sep 24, 2009
No. 13-09-00237-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Dodeka

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. DODEKA L. L. C., Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Sep 24, 2009

Citations

No. 13-09-00237-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 24, 2009)