From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Credco

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 21, 2022
2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW

11-21-2022

LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff v. CORELOGIC CREDCO, et al., Defendants


ORDER

ANDREW P. GORDON, DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 27, 2022, plaintiff Leticia Rodriguez and defendant CoreLogic Teletrack advised the court that they had settled the dispute between them, and they requested 60 days to file a stipulation to dismiss. ECF No. 47. More than 60 days passed with no stipulation, so I ordered the parties to file either a stipulation to dismiss or a joint status report by November 18, 2022. ECF No. 51. The parties did not respond.

I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff Leticia Rodriguez and defendant CoreLogic Teletrack shall file either a stipulation to dismiss or a joint status report by December 1, 2022. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of claims or defenses.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Credco

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 21, 2022
2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Credco

Case Details

Full title:LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff v. CORELOGIC CREDCO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2022)