From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-258 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-258

03-16-2012

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 4), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 4) is adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED, without prejudice to Petitioner's ability to file a similar petition after he has exhausted state remedies.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.

____________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-258 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-258 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)