From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 11, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-830 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-830

06-11-2012

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 7), filed May 10, 2012, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ordered that:

1. The magistrate judge's report (Doc. 7) is adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED, without prejudice to Petitioner's ability to file a similar petition after he has exhausted state remedies.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.
4. A certificate of appealability is denied.

___________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 11, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-830 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-830 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

LoDuca v. McGinley

report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:12-CV-830, 2012 WL 2115415 (M.D. Pa. June 11, 2012). Therefore, a…