From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 24, 2008
1:08-cv-00856 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)

Opinion

1:08-cv-00856 OWW GSA.

December 24, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Document 44)


On October 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be DENIED without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15) court days of the date of service of the order. On November 21, 2008, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On December 10, 2008, Defendants National Railroad Passenger Corporation and BNSF Railway Company filed an opposition to Plaintiff's objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued October 30, 2008, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Remand is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 24, 2008
1:08-cv-00856 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus

Case Details

Full title:LUCIO CORRAL RODRIGUEZ, individually and as Successor in Interest to the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 24, 2008

Citations

1:08-cv-00856 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sabetta v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

AMTRAK is a federally chartered corporation of which the United States owns more than 50 percent of the…

Lopez v. Wasco State Prison

The rule that all defendants must join in a removal only applies to defendants properly joined and served in…