Opinion
2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW
04-19-2022
LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CORELOGIC TELETRACK; CHECK CITY and TRANS UNION LLC, Defendants.
CLARK HILL PLLC Gia N, Marina Attorney for Defendant Corelogic Teletrack David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Miles N. Clark, Esq. KNEPPER & CLARK LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff
CLARK HILL PLLC
Gia N, Marina
Attorney for Defendant Corelogic Teletrack
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Shawn Miller, Esq.
KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT CORELOGIC TELETRACKTO FILE ANSWER
FIRST REQUEST
Defendant Corelogic Teletrack (“Teletrack”) has requested an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, to which Plaintiff has no opposition. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and among counsel, that Teletrack's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended from April 13, 2022 through and including May 13, 2022. The request was made by Teletrak so that it can have an opportunity to collect and review its internal files pertaining to the allegations in the Complaint, and Plaintiff approves. This stipulation is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED: