From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hospital

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
21-cv-04552-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04552-HSG

07-27-2021

JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge.

On or about June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. That same day, the Clerk of the Court informed Plaintiff that this action was deficient because he had not submitted an in forma pauperis application or paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 3. The Court provided Plaintiff with a blank in forma pauperis application and a postage-paid return envelope. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff was instructed to respond within twenty-eight days of the date of the order. Id. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not submitted the required documents. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must contain either the full filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hospital

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
21-cv-04552-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04552-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)