From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Cnty. of Tulare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 11-1091 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 11-1091 LJO SKO

07-16-2012

GENEVIEVE RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT

(Doc. 22-24.)

The parties' counsel have indicated that plaintiff has accepted the defense settlement offer. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than August 6, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed.

This Court VACATES the July 26, 2012 hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss but vacates no other dates at this time. This Court will take no further action on defendants' motion to dismiss at this time. However, if settlement is not completed timely, this Court will entertain the motion to dismiss without a hearing.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

The clerk is directed to term doc. 22. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Cnty. of Tulare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 11-1091 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Cnty. of Tulare

Case Details

Full title:GENEVIEVE RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 11-1091 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)