From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

Motion No: M-4639

12-15-2016

Carlos Rodriguez, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. City of New York, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.


Plaintiff-appellant-respondent having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court entered on September 1, 2016 (Appeal No. 16336-37N), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted, and this Court, pursuant to CPLR 5713, certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals:

"Was the order of Supreme Court, as affirmed by this Court, properly made?" This Court further certifies that its determination was made as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. (See M-5406, decided simultaneously herewith).

ENTERED: December 15, 2016

_______________________ CLERK

PRESENT - Hon. Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, John W. Sweeny, Jr. Rolando T. Acosta Richard T. Andrias Karla Moskowitz, Justices

M-4639

Index No. 109444/11


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Carlos Rodriguez, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. City of New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. City of N.Y.

, would have held that plaintiff does not bear the burden of disproving the affirmative defense of…