From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1958
7 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

December 22, 1958


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a dismissal of the complaint at the close of the entire case. Appellant was injured when he tripped over the edge of a break in a public sidewalk. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: Under all the circumstances, a question of fact was presented for the jury as to whether the defect in the sidewalk was the proximate cause of appellant's fall and consequent injuries — bearing in mind that the locus in quo is part of an extremely busy and crowded thoroughfare and is adjacent to a subway entrance.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1958
7 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1958

Citations

7 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)