From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 28, 2011
NO. 10-0736-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0736-FJP-DLD.

September 28, 2011


OPINION


After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which an objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims, and that the defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, shall be granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claim asserted against defendant Burl Cain — that the defendant failed to train and/or supervise his employees — for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and dismissing all of the plaintiff's remaining claims asserted against the defendants, with prejudice, and that this action shall be dismissed.

Rec. Doc. Nos. 18, 31 and 57. Doc#47497

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 28, 2011
NO. 10-0736-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:LUIS RODRIGUEZ (#381927) v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

NO. 10-0736-FJP-DLD (M.D. La. Sep. 28, 2011)