From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Andoxx Corporation

United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Dec 9, 2005
Civil No. 05-1821(DRD), Docket #7 (D.P.R. Dec. 9, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-1821(DRD), Docket #7.

December 9, 2005


MOTION TO DISMISS ORDER


DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint at Docket No. 13. The Court notes that Rule 15(a) provides that "leave shall be freely given when justice so requires". Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). "In the absence of any apparent or declared reason — such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc. — the leave sought should, as the rule require, be `freely given'". Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. at 182. Because the record is devoid of any apparent or declared reason of prejudice by the defendant, the Second Amended Complaint was granted by the Court (Docket No. 16). Accordingly, the instant motion to dismiss must be denied without prejudice and shall be resubmitted should moving party deem warranted under the allegations of the second amended complaint.

Accordingly, filings at Docket Nos. 8, and 15 are found to be MOOT for premature at this point of the proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Andoxx Corporation

United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Dec 9, 2005
Civil No. 05-1821(DRD), Docket #7 (D.P.R. Dec. 9, 2005)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Andoxx Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JAIME QUINONES RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDOXX CORPORATION d/b/a PLAVICA…

Court:United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Date published: Dec 9, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 05-1821(DRD), Docket #7 (D.P.R. Dec. 9, 2005)