From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Albonico

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 17, 2022
2:19-cv-1108 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1108 MCE AC P

11-17-2022

DAVID ARNOLD RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. N. ALBONICO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has requested an extension of time to file an amended response to defendants' objections to the September 7, 2022 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 86. He seeks additional time to obtain historical versions of the California regulations governing inmate appeals. Id. Because plaintiff has already filed two responses to defendants' objections (ECF Nos. 84, 85) and this court has access to the historical regulations, the motion for extension will be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 86) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Albonico

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 17, 2022
2:19-cv-1108 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Albonico

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ARNOLD RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. N. ALBONICO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-1108 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2022)