From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. 935 Ogden Ave. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
21-CV-02573 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-02573 (PAE) (RWL)

05-02-2022

JOAQUIN RODRIGUEZ Plaintiff, v. 935 OGDEN AVE. CORP., et al. Defendants.


APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This case is an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law. Before the Court is the parties' joint letter request that the Court approve their settlement agreement, a fully executed copy of which was submitted on April 29, 2022. A federal court is obligated to determine whether settlement of an FLSA case under the court's consideration is fair and reasonable and the subject of an arm's length negotiation, not an employer's overreaching. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement as well as the parties' letter. The Court has taken into account, without limitation, prior proceedings in this action; the attendant risks, burdens, and costs associated with continuing the action; the range of possible recovery; whether the Settlement Agreement is the product of arm's length bargaining between experienced counsel or parties; the amount of attorney's fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion. Among other attributes of the Settlement Agreement, there are no confidentiality restrictions; the releases are general but mutual; and the attorneys' fees are within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. Considering all the circumstances, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable and hereby approved.

This case, having resolved by settlement, is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees except as agreed to in writing by the parties. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all motions and deadlines, and close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. 935 Ogden Ave. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
21-CV-02573 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. 935 Ogden Ave. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOAQUIN RODRIGUEZ Plaintiff, v. 935 OGDEN AVE. CORP., et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

21-CV-02573 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)