From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. 1585 Broadway Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1997
243 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 21, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


Reargument was properly granted, and the motions for summary judgment properly denied, upon a showing that the IAS Court had overlooked plain conflicts in the evidence as to, among other things, which trades were working on the day of the accident, what they were doing and where they were doing it, as well as in the witnesses' accounts of the accident.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach JJ.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. 1585 Broadway Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1997
243 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. 1585 Broadway Associates

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant-Respondent, v. 1585 BROADWAY ASSOCIATES et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Qureshi v. Cozine

It is well settled that where there are conflicting witness accounts, summary judgment should not be granted…