From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez-Lehmann v. Conde

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1989
549 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2620.

October 10, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ronald M. Friedman, Judge.

Mendez Mendez, and Sergio L. Mendez, for appellants.

Sutton, Jamerson Mullin and John D. Sutton, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


It is undisputed that appellants, defendants below, did not receive notice of the motion for summary judgment or proceedings thereon. The motion for relief from judgment should have been granted pursuant to Rule 1.540(b)(4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The final judgment is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Rodriguez-Lehmann v. Conde

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1989
549 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Rodriguez-Lehmann v. Conde

Case Details

Full title:MARUCHI RODRIGUEZ-LEHMANN, JORGE LEHMANN AND ELEVAGE TRAVEL, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 10, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)