From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodrigues v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 3, 1970
473 P.2d 509 (Haw. 1970)

Opinion

No. 4833.

September 3, 1970.

RICHARDSON, C.J., ABE, LEVINSON, JJ., HAWKINS, CIRCUIT JUDGE, IN PLACE OF MARUMOTO, J., DISQUALIFIED, AND LAURETA, CIRCUIT JUDGE, IN PLACE OF KOBAYASHI, J., DISQUALIFIED.

Frank D. Padgett ( Padgett, Greeley, Marumoto Akinaka of counsel) for the petition.


Movants (Plaintiffs-Appellees), ask this court to grant a rehearing for the sole purpose of permitting them to request this court to broaden its mandate to allow the court below, on remand, to consider an issue that was never ruled upon by the lower court and that was never heretofore raised in this appeal. Under Rule 3(b) (3), Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, this issue is not properly before this court, either on the appeal or on a petition for rehearing. State v. Kahua Ranch, 47 Haw. 466 (1964). Our ruling in Levy v. Kimball, 51 Haw. 540 (1970), urged in the motion, does not relieve movants from their failure to raise the issue.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

Rodrigues v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 3, 1970
473 P.2d 509 (Haw. 1970)
Case details for

Rodrigues v. State

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT E. RODRIGUES, JR. AND ADALINE RODRIGUES v. STATE OF HAWAII

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Sep 3, 1970

Citations

473 P.2d 509 (Haw. 1970)
473 P.2d 509

Citing Cases

Wong v. Jing

( Id. at pp. 927-930; see Burgess v. Superior Court, supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 1073, fn. 6 ["[t]he requirement…

SIU v. ALWIS

Doe Parents, 58 P.3d at 90; see also Soone v. Kyo-Ya Co., 353 F. Supp. 2d 1107, 1118 (D. Haw. 2005). These…