From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodrigeuz v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 6, 2008
CV-F-05-0230 GSA (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2008)

Opinion

CV-F-05-0230 GSA (HC).

May 6, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR MAY 15, 2008 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT


Petitioner OMERO BECERRA RODRIGUEZ requests that the Court reschedule the conference call previously scheduled for May 15, 2008 to allow for Petitioner's attorney to be absent on vacation out of the country from May 9, 2008 to May 17, 2008. Counsel states opposing counsel has no opposition to such request. Counsel for Petitioner and Respondent both also request that the Court set a status date by which both counsel can advise the Court, by way of electronically filed joint status report, counsels' respective progress toward preparing for an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner's counsel and Respondent's counsel suggest that a joint status report be filed by June 15, 2008.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the conference call currently scheduled for May 15, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. be cancelled, and that the parties file a joint status report to the court on or before June 15, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodrigeuz v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 6, 2008
CV-F-05-0230 GSA (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Rodrigeuz v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:OMERO BECERRA RODRIGEUZ, Petitioner, v. J. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

CV-F-05-0230 GSA (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2008)