From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodney K. v. Mobile Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Mar 23, 2022
Civil Action 1:18-cv-343-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:18-cv-343-TFM-N

03-23-2022

RODNEY K. SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOBILE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

TERRY F. MOORER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the memorandum opinions and orders that were entered on March 2, 2022, (Doc. 231) and March 22, 2022, (Doc. 241) it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED judgment is entered in favor of:

(1) Defendant Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County as to Counts 2, 3, and 4;

(2) Defendant Douglas Harwell, Jr., as to Counts 2 and 3;

(3) Defendant Don Stringfellow as to Counts 2 and 3;

(4) Defendant Reginald Crenshaw as to Counts 2 and 3;

(5) Defendant Robert Battles as to Counts 2 and 3;

(6) Defendant William Foster as to Counts 2 and 3;

(7) Defendant Superintendent Martha L. Peek as to Counts 2 and 3;

(8) Defendant Principal Lewis Copeland as to Counts 2, 5, 9, 10, and 11;

(9) Defendant Coach Fred Riley as to Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11;

(10) Defendant Coach Bobby J. Pope as to Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11;

(11) Defendant Coach Miller as to Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and

(12) Defendant Coach Eubanks as to Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, and against Plaintiffs Rodney K., Sr.; Mary K.; R. K., Jr.; Garrian Tre Betts; Stacy Stanton Terry; Kennesha Quinnie; Colby Quinnie; Jeremiah Chatman; Lyman Collins, Sr.; Tiffanie Collins; and Lyman Collins, Jr., and those claims against those defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice.

Further, in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order that was entered on July 25, 2019, (Doc. 50) it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County; Douglas Harwell, Jr.; Don Stringfellow; Reginald Crenshaw; Robert Battles; and William Foster as to Counts 1, 5, 9, 10, and 11 and against Plaintiffs, and those claims against those defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodney K. v. Mobile Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Mar 23, 2022
Civil Action 1:18-cv-343-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Rodney K. v. Mobile Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY K. SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOBILE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:18-cv-343-TFM-N (S.D. Ala. Mar. 23, 2022)