From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Steber

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2006
No. CIV 05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV 05-0850 DFL PAN P.

February 27, 2006


ORDER


On November 20, 2005, defendant Hendricks filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." On August 4, 2005, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to motions and that failure to oppose a motion may be deemed consent to the relief requested in the motion.

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed August 4, 2005, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Steber

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2006
No. CIV 05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Steber

Case Details

Full title:James T. Rodgers, Plaintiff, v. Greg Steber, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2006

Citations

No. CIV 05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)