From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jul 2, 2020
NO. 14-20-00343-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 14-20-00343-CR

07-02-2020

CHRISTOPHER ROLAND RODGERS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 18-CR-2844

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is pro se. No reporter's record has been filed in this case. On June 15, 2020, Ada V. Christy, the official court reporter for the 212th District Court, informed this court that appellant had not requested preparation of a reporter's record and had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and is not appealing as indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(A). This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we enter the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).

We ORDER the judge of the 212th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant, appellant's counsel, if any, and counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. The judge may appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court's findings and conclusions, and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court's active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court's active docket when the trial court's findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court's order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Zimmerer and Poissant.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jul 2, 2020
NO. 14-20-00343-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Rodgers v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ROLAND RODGERS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 2, 2020

Citations

NO. 14-20-00343-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2020)