From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 30, 2012
382 S.W.3d 918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 74536.

2012-10-30

Darell T. RODGERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Justine E. Del Muro, Judge. Frederick Ernst and Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Justine E. Del Muro, Judge.
Frederick Ernst and Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: ALOK AHUJA, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Darell Rodgers appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Rodgers claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he established that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary in that his plea counsel coerced him into pleading guilty by failing to investigate and prepare a defense. Rodgers claims that had he not been coerced by plea counsel, he would not have pled guilty but would have proceeded to trial. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rodgers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 30, 2012
382 S.W.3d 918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Rodgers v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darell T. RODGERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

382 S.W.3d 918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. Denney

Petitioner, a convicted state prisoner currently confined at the Crossroads Correctional Center in Cameron,…