From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Pinole Steakhouse L.P.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 18, 2014
C 14-0083 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)

Opinion


JOHN RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. PINOLE STEAKHOUSE L.P., et al., Defendants. No. C 14-0083 MEJ. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division. August 18, 2014.

          ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION

          ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request to allow defendant Pinole Steakhouse L.P.'s insurer representative, Kate Sherman, to appear telephonically at the August 28, 2014, mediation before Marjorie Gelb is GRANTED. The excused parties shall be available at all times to participate telephonically in the mediation as set forth in ADR L.R. 6-10(f).

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that named defendants Kathy Lin and Henry Yip are excused from participating in the mediation.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Pinole Steakhouse L.P.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 18, 2014
C 14-0083 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Pinole Steakhouse L.P.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. PINOLE STEAKHOUSE L.P., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2014

Citations

C 14-0083 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)