From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 10, 2011
2:10-CV-01361-SU (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-01361-SU

08-10-2011

JIMMY L. RODGERS, Petitioner, v. MR. D. MILLS, Respondent.


ORDER

BROWN , Judge.

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (#15) on June 20, 2011, in which she recommends this Court deny Petitioner Jimmy L. Rodger's Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny a certificate of appealability. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and DENIES a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Aug 10, 2011
2:10-CV-01361-SU (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY L. RODGERS, Petitioner, v. MR. D. MILLS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

2:10-CV-01361-SU (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2011)