Rodgers v. Mills

Full title: JIMMY L. RODGERS, Petitioner, v. MR. D. MILLS, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

2:10-CV-01361-SU (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-01361-SU.

August 11, 2011

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (#15) on June 20, 2011, in which she recommends this Court deny Petitioner Jimmy L. Rodger's Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny a certificate of appealability. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003) ( en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9^th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and DENIES a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 10^th day of August, 2011.