From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Langford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2018
Case No. CV 18-6263 JAK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 18-6263 JAK(JC)

07-25-2018

RANDALL RODGERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN S. LANGFORD, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that the "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 U.S.C. § 2241)" ("Petition") is construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("Section 2255 Motion") and that the Petition/Section 2255 Motion and this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

DATED: July 25, 2018

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Langford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2018
Case No. CV 18-6263 JAK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2018)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Langford

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL RODGERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN S. LANGFORD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 25, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 18-6263 JAK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2018)