From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Davis

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 6, 2023
1:19-cv-16612 (NLH) (D.N.J. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:19-cv-16612 (NLH)

04-06-2023

LAVAR T. RODGERS, Petitioner, v. BRUCE DAVIS, et al., Respondents.

Lavar T. Rodgers, 785973, New Jersey State Prison, Petitioner Pro se. Matthew J. Platkin, New Jersey Attorney General, Regina Marie Oberholzer, Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Justice, Attorneys for Respondents.


APPEARANCES:

Lavar T. Rodgers, 785973, New Jersey State Prison, Petitioner Pro se.

Matthew J. Platkin, New Jersey Attorney General, Regina Marie Oberholzer, Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Justice, Attorneys for Respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, Petitioner Lavar T. Rodgers filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, see ECF No. 1; and

WHEREAS, Respondents filed their answer on March 18, 2020, ECF No. 12; and

WHEREAS, On May 8, 2020, Petitioner filed a motion for a stay and abeyance based on his desire to file a second postconviction relief (“PCR”) motion in the state courts “to exhaust the kidnapping offense, and ineffective assistance of counsel, from trial appellate and first (1st) PCR counsel for not addressing or investigating this incident, for [that] there was evidence to dispute otherwise.” ECF No. 14 at 3; and

WHEREAS, the Court granted the motion on June 30, 2020 over Respondents' objection, ECF No. 21; and

WHEREAS, the Court ordered Petitioner to inform the Court within 30 days of completing state court exhaustion. Id. As part of his submission, Petitioner was to “file a second amended petition containing all claims he wishes the Court to review, even if he has already included those claims in his prior submissions. In other words, the second amended petition should gather in one place every claim Petitioner is raising under § 2254. If a claim is not in the second amended petition, the Court will consider the claim waived,” ECF No. 20 at 5; and

WHEREAS, Petitioner submitted a letter to the Court on April 5, 2023 indicating that he had received a final decision from the New Jersey Supreme Court and wanted to reopen his habeas proceedings, ECF No. 23; and

WHEREAS, the Court will reopen this matter for consideration. However, Petitioner did not comply with the Court's direction to submit a second amended petition with his request to reopen his habeas proceedings; and

WHEREAS, the Court will direct the Clerk to send Petitioner a blank form for habeas proceedings. Petitioner is to complete the form and return it to the Court within 30 days. The returned form must contain all claims that Petitioner “wishes the Court to review, even if he has already included those claims in his prior submissions. In other words, the second amended petition should gather in one place every claim Petitioner is raising under § 2254. If a claim is not in the second amended petition, the Court will consider the claim waived”; and

WEHREAS, if Petitioner does not return the completed form within 30 days, the Court will review Petitioner's habeas claims on the record presently before the Court, ORDERED that the Clerk shall LIFT the stay and restore this matter to the Court's active docket; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Petitioner a blank form for § 2254 proceedings, AO 241 (modified):DNJ-Habeas-008(Rev.01-2014); and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner is to complete the form and return it to the Court within 30 days. The returned form must contain all claims that Petitioner wishes the Court to review. If a claim is not in the second amended petition, the Court will consider the claim waived; and it is further

ORDERED that if Petitioner does not return the completed form within 30 days, the Court will review Petitioner's habeas claims on the record presently before the Court; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner by regular mail.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Davis

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 6, 2023
1:19-cv-16612 (NLH) (D.N.J. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:LAVAR T. RODGERS, Petitioner, v. BRUCE DAVIS, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

1:19-cv-16612 (NLH) (D.N.J. Apr. 6, 2023)