From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Feb 29, 2012
Civil No. 11-0095-TC (D. Or. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-0095-TC

02-29-2012

PAUL RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on January 25, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is affired. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

_________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Feb 29, 2012
Civil No. 11-0095-TC (D. Or. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PAUL RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-0095-TC (D. Or. Feb. 29, 2012)