From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II
Nov 18, 2009
2009 Ark. App. 778 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

CA 09-606

Opinion Delivered November 18, 2009

Appeal from the Craighead County Circuit Court, [No. JV 2008-199], Honorable Cindy Thyer, Judge, Remanded to Settle the Record.


On March 3, 2009, the Craighead County Circuit Court terminated the parental rights of appellant Tonya Rodgers to her son, C.R., born January 6, 2004. Rodgers's attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(j)(1). The Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) has not filed a brief. We cannot reach the merits of this appeal because the record is deficient.

One of the grounds for termination of Rodgers's parental rights found by the circuit court was that Rodgers had subjected her son to aggravated circumstances in that a determination had been made by a judge that there was little likelihood that services to the family would result in successful reunification. See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341(b)(3)(B) (ix)(a)( 3)( A) and ( B)( i) (Repl. 2008). The record reflects that DHS filed a motion seeking to terminate all reunification services. Counsel for Rodgers and the attorney ad litem both stated that DHS's motion for no reunification services had been granted. However, the order is not contained in the record.

Rule 6(e) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure-Civil provides in relevant part that:

If anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident or is misstated therein, . . . the appellate court on proper suggestion, or on its own initiative, may direct that the omission or misstatement shall be corrected, and if necessary, that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted. . . .

Because the order disposing of DHS's motion to be relieved of providing services is not contained in the record, we remand for the record to be settled within fifteen days from entry of this order.

Remanded to settle the record.

PITTMAN and BAKER, JJ., agree.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II
Nov 18, 2009
2009 Ark. App. 778 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services

Case Details

Full title:Tonya RODGERS, Appellant v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II

Date published: Nov 18, 2009

Citations

2009 Ark. App. 778 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

We affirm. See Rodgers v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2010 Ark.App. 172, 2010 WL 546374 (rebriefing); Rodgers…

Rodgers v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

On November 18, 2009, we remanded this case to settle the record concerning whether the circuit court had, in…