From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodenkirch v. Babin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-488-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Sep. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-488-JWD-SDJ

09-16-2020

THOMAS MICHAEL RODENKIRCH (#727047) v. RICKY BABIN


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated July 23, 2020 (Doc. 29), to which no objection was filed;

The Court notes that on August 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. On August 12, 2020, Magistrate Judge Johnson denied Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time to respond Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, as the report and recommendation made clear that ABSOLUTELY NO EXTENSION OF TIME SHALL BE GRANTED. See R. Doc. 29, p. 1. --------

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 21) is DENIED as futile.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22) filed on behalf of Ricky Babin is GRANTED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 16, 2020.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Rodenkirch v. Babin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-488-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Sep. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Rodenkirch v. Babin

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MICHAEL RODENKIRCH (#727047) v. RICKY BABIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 16, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-488-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Sep. 16, 2020)