From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roden v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2017
CASE NUMBER: 16-11208 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 16-11208

06-29-2017

Jonathon Stewart Roden, Plaintiff, v. Michelle Floyd, et al., Defendant.



MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On May 31, 2017, Magistrate Judge Patti issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 40], recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 19] be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Defendant's motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS ORDERED.

/s/ Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge Dated: June 29, 2017 The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and Jonathan Stewart Roden by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 29, 2017. S/Linda Vertriest
Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Roden v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2017
CASE NUMBER: 16-11208 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Roden v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:Jonathon Stewart Roden, Plaintiff, v. Michelle Floyd, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 16-11208 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2017)