From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodebaugh v. Haynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-11-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-11-DPM-BD

03-13-2013

EUGENE RODNEY RODEBAUGH Reg. # 18266-045 PETITIONER v. ANTHONY HAYNES, Warden, FCI - Forrest City RESPONDENT


ORDER

Rodebaugh's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the Bureau of Prisons' decision to assign him a Sex Offender Public Safety Factor based on conduct that occurred during his incarceration in Missouri. He has not objected to Magistrate Judge Beth M. Deere's recommendation, Document No. 2, that the Court dismiss the petition for lack of habeas corpus jurisdiction. Reviewing that recommendation for legal error and clear factual error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to Advisory Committee notes), the Court adopts it with two clarifications. First, the third citation on page five should be Bazuaye v. Tombone, 275 F.3d 44 (5th Cir. 2001). Second, all three cases on page five are unpublished opinions cited for their persuasive value only.

So Ordered.

______________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodebaugh v. Haynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-11-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Rodebaugh v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE RODNEY RODEBAUGH Reg. # 18266-045 PETITIONER v. ANTHONY HAYNES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-11-DPM-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Vaughan v. Hendrix

Thus, properly characterized, Vaughan is asserting a conditions of confinement claim that is not cognizable…

Todd v. Garrett

Such a claim is not cognizable under § 2241. See Vaughan v. Hendrix, No. 219CV00046DPMJTR, 2019 WL 4412290,…