From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roddy v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 29, 1996
668 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 1996)

Opinion

No. 86256.

February 29, 1996.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance Third District — Nos. 94-2891 and 94-2858, Dade County.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Respondent.


We have for review Roddy v. State, 658 So.2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3 (b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Daniel, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roddy v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 29, 1996
668 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 1996)
Case details for

Roddy v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO RODDY, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 29, 1996

Citations

668 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 1996)