From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roddenberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1954
90 Ga. App. 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)

Opinion

35116.

DECIDED APRIL 13, 1954.

Violating liquor law. Before Judge Thomas. Appling Superior Court. January 9, 1954.

Milton C. Grainger, Jack W. Ballenger, for plaintiff in error.

W. Glenn Thomas, Solicitor-General, contra.


The assignment of error in the sole special ground of the motion for new trial, that the defendant's right of cross-examination was abridged by the trial court's refusal to require the sheriff of the county to divulge the name of the "decoy" who accompanied the revenue officer to the defendant's home and was supposedly present at the time the defendant sold the whisky to the revenue agent, is determinative of this case; and upon this point this case is controlled by the decision in Crosby v. State, ante.

Judgment reversed. Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 13, 1954.


Summaries of

Roddenberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1954
90 Ga. App. 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
Case details for

Roddenberry v. State

Case Details

Full title:RODDENBERRY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 13, 1954

Citations

90 Ga. App. 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
82 S.E.2d 40

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

The more recent cases are those cited in Headnote 1, above. The older cases are Crosby v. State, 90 Ga. App.…

Wilson v. Hopper

The state relied upon circumstantial evidence to establish the offense of the sale of heroin by appellant to…