From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodasti v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Sep 18, 1991
815 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 751-90.

June 12, 1991. Rehearing Denied September 18, 1991.

Appeal from 177th Judicial District, Harris County; Allen Stilley, J.

Robert J. Inger, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Alan Curry and Bill Delmore, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON THE STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


A jury convicted appellant, Steven James Rodasti, of aggravated sexual assault and assessed his punishment at confinement for life. Appellant appealed. The Court of Appeals initially affirmed the conviction. Rodasti v. State, 749 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1988). Upon discretionary review this Court vacated the lower appellate court's judgment and remanded the case to it. Rodasti v. State, 786 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Cr.App. 1989). Upon remand from this Court, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction but, finding reversible error in the punishment phase of trial, the Court remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. Rodasti v. State, 790 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1990). Thereafter, the State filed its petition for discretionary review.

We now summarily grant the State's petition, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to it to consider its opinion in light of our decision in Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr.App. 1991).

CLINTON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Rodasti v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Sep 18, 1991
815 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)
Case details for

Rodasti v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven James RODASTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Sep 18, 1991

Citations

815 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Gann v. State

He asserts his counsel should have objected to the introduction of copies of district court judgments that…