From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rockwell v. Doe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2109 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2109 GEB DAD P.

October 12, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 19, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and forty-five days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The forty-five day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Rockwell v. Doe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2109 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Rockwell v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ROCKWELL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 12, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2109 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2005)