From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rockwell Fin. Grp. v. Bird

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 16, 2024
23-CV-5704 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-5704 (JPO)

01-16-2024

ROCKWELL FINANCIAL GROUP, et al., Petitioners, v. MARK BIRD, Respondent.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:

Petitioners filed a petition to vacate an arbitration award on July 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Respondent Mark Bird submitted a waiver of service on October 2, 2023 and agreed to serve an answer or motion under Rule 12 within sixty days of that date. (ECF No. 3.) The Court then granted two letter motions requesting extensions of time to file an answer to the petition, and it directed Respondent to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the petition on or before December 29, 2023. (ECF Nos. 5, 7.) No response to the petition to vacate arbitration has been filed in the allotted time, nor has Petitioner moved for a default judgment.

Petitioner is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Respondent or Respondent's counsel regarding a response to the petition.

If Petitioner fails by February 6, 2024 to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Respondent, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Respondent.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rockwell Fin. Grp. v. Bird

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 16, 2024
23-CV-5704 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Rockwell Fin. Grp. v. Bird

Case Details

Full title:ROCKWELL FINANCIAL GROUP, et al., Petitioners, v. MARK BIRD, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

23-CV-5704 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)