From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rochester v. Urch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
C.A. No. 8:12-1356-TLW-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

C.A. No. 8:12-1356-TLW-JDA

07-24-2012

Brandon Ray Rochester, Plaintiff, v. Maj. Neal Urch; Spartanburg Co. Detention Facility; Officer Shelton; and Officer Fleisher, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is now before the undersigned for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin, to whom this case had previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). In her Report, Magistrate Judge Austin recommends that the Plaintiff's complaint be partially dismissed as to Defendant "Spartanburg Co. Detention Facility," without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Report was filed on May 31, 2012. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report.

This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections have been filed to the Report. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).

A review of the record indicates that the Report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ACCEPTED (Doc. # 16), and Plaintiff's complaint is PARTIALLY DISMISSED as to Defendant "Spartanburg Co. Detention Facility," without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

TERRY L. WOOTEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 24, 2012

Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

Rochester v. Urch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
C.A. No. 8:12-1356-TLW-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Rochester v. Urch

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Ray Rochester, Plaintiff, v. Maj. Neal Urch; Spartanburg Co…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

C.A. No. 8:12-1356-TLW-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 24, 2012)