From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rochester and Honeoye Valley RR Co. v. C. of R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

February Term, 1897.


It appearing that there are not four justices of the Appellate Division, in the fourth judicial department, who "are qualified to sit herein" and take part in the decision of the appeals brought into the fourth Appellate Division in this case, it is now ordered and directed that the appeals in this case be and the same are hereby "sent to the third judicial department, to be there heard and determined." Either party is authorized to give notice to bring on the argument of said appeals in the Appellate Division of the third judicial department. All concurred, except Follett, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Rochester and Honeoye Valley RR Co. v. C. of R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Rochester and Honeoye Valley RR Co. v. C. of R

Case Details

Full title:The Rochester and Honeoye Valley Railroad Company, Respondent, v. The City…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1897

Citations

14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)