From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roche v. Mason

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2024
CIVIL 3:24-cv-270 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:24-cv-270

10-02-2024

JAMES ROCHE, Plaintiff v. WARDEN MASON, et al., Defendants


ORDER

MARIANI, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2024, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by Defendants Mason, Taylor, and Rebarchak, and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice as to Plaintiff's FTCA claim and the claims against Defendants Mason and Taylor. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendants Mason and Taylor as parties to this action.
2. The amendment (Doc. 22) against Defendants Rennenger and Kabilko is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
3. The motion (Doc. 12) to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice and with leave to amend as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Rebarchak, Rennenger, and Kabilko, and the John Doe individuals.
4. Plaintiff may file, on or before October 16, 2024, a proposed amended complaint.
5. The proposed amended complaint shall contain the same case number that is already assigned to this action, 3:24-cv-270.1
6. The proposed amended complaint shall be direct, concise, and shall standalone without reference to any other document filed in this matter or any other civil matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1).
7. Plaintiff shall identify the individual officials responsible for the misconduct and explain how each was involved in the alleged violations of his civil rights, including references to relevant dates, times, and locations.
8. Plaintiff is strictly cautioned that the inclusion of separate, unrelated claims will be considered a failure to comply with an Order of Court and will result in the striking of the proposed amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2).
9. Failure to file a proposed amended complaint within the timeframe set forth in paragraph 4 will convert the remaining dismissal of the amended complaint without prejudice to a dismissal with prejudice without the necessity of a further Order of Court.
10. Any appeal from this Order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Roche v. Mason

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2024
CIVIL 3:24-cv-270 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Roche v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROCHE, Plaintiff v. WARDEN MASON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 3:24-cv-270 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2024)