From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roche v. Floral Rental Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 4, 1968
237 A.2d 265 (N.J. 1968)

Opinion

Argued December 19, 1967 —

Decided January 4, 1968.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Joseph V. Cullum for defendant-appellant.

Mr. Joseph Coult for defendants-respondents ( Mr. Philip M. Lustbader, Messrs. Schneider Morgan, Messrs. Shenier Gilady, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf for the plaintiff-respondent ( Messrs. Nochimson, Irwin and Larsen, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 95 N.J. Super. 555.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Roche v. Floral Rental Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 4, 1968
237 A.2d 265 (N.J. 1968)
Case details for

Roche v. Floral Rental Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RITA ROCHE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. ROCHE, DECEASED…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 4, 1968

Citations

237 A.2d 265 (N.J. 1968)
237 A.2d 265

Citing Cases

Young v. Gilbert

Accordingly, regardless of any other relationship of defendant King Pin Alleys to this State, I am convinced…

Van Eeuwen v. Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.

In those circumstances it is neither unfair nor unjust to subject HDAG to a suit in this State by a New…