From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rocha v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 23, 2016
211 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–4265.

08-23-2016

Daniel ROCHA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

Petitioner's motion to supplement is denied as moot.

WALLACE, CRENSHAW, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Rocha v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 23, 2016
211 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rocha v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daniel ROCHA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 23, 2016

Citations

211 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)