In Della Rocco (252 A.D.2d at 84, 683 N.Y.S.2d 622), the CBA provided that the defendant “would provide insurance coverage ‘equivalent to the plan presently in effect for each member of the Department and his [or her] family, and for retired members and their families' ” (emphasis added).
Summary of this case from Kolbe v. TibbettsDecided July 8, 1999
Appeal from the (3d Dept: 252 A.D.2d 82).
FINALITY OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed.
In Della Rocco (252 A.D.2d at 84, 683 N.Y.S.2d 622), the CBA provided that the defendant “would provide insurance coverage ‘equivalent to the plan presently in effect for each member of the Department and his [or her] family, and for retired members and their families' ” (emphasis added).
Summary of this case from Kolbe v. TibbettsFull title:DELLA ROCCO v. CITY OF SCHENECTADY
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 8, 1999
Supreme Court granted petitioners' cross motion, finding that the plain language of the CBAs unambiguously…
Mariano v. Town of Orchard ParkN.E.2d 827). Second, if there is no such prohibition against arbitrating the grievance at issue, then a…