From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roccaro v. Covenant Living W.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
1:21-cv-01416-NONE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01416-NONE-SAB

09-27-2021

DALLENE ROCCARO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COVENANT LIVING WEST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Stanley A. Boone-United States Magistrate Judge

On August 23, 2021, Plaintiffs filed this action in the Stanislaus County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1 at 2.) Service of the summons and complaint was completed on August 24, 2021. (Id.) On September 22, 2021, Defendants removed this action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants' notice of removal does not include any responsive pleadings filed in the state court.

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a] defendant who did not answer before removal must answer or present other defenses or objections under these rules within the longest of these periods: (A) 21 days after receiving--through service or otherwise--a copy of the initial pleading stating the claim for relief; (B) 21 days after being served with the summons for an initial pleading on file at the time of service; or (C) 7 days after the notice of removal is filed.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 81(c)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within seven (7) days of the date of entry of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roccaro v. Covenant Living W.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
1:21-cv-01416-NONE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Roccaro v. Covenant Living W.

Case Details

Full title:DALLENE ROCCARO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COVENANT LIVING WEST, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01416-NONE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)