From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robles v. Palazzolo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Summary

In Robles v Palazzolo Realty Corp. (66 AD3d 417, 418 [1st Dept 2009]), an apartment building tenant brought an action against the landlord and landlord's president, alleging negligence in the maintenance of the apartment building.

Summary of this case from Baker v. 40 E. 80 Apartment Corp.

Opinion

No. 1051.

October 6, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered June 11, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied so much of defendants' motion as sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Chris Hanover, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, that portion of the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed as against said defendant. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Vozza Vozza, Harrison, (Joseph Vozza of counsel), for appellant.

Sinel Associates, PLLC, New York (Martin M. Howfield of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


Plaintiff bases her causes of action upon allegations of negligence in the maintenance of the apartment building in which she resided. Hanover is the president of defendant Palazzolo Realty Corp., the owner of the premises. The conduct plaintiff attributes to Hanover amounts to nothing more than nonfeasance, for which he bears no liability as a corporate officer ( see MLM LLC v Karamouzis, 2 AD3d 161). Supreme Court, however, denied the motion with respect to Hanover on the sole ground that he was the registered managing agent of the building. This conclusion could only have been based on an unsworn printout of a building registration summary report of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD). The court's reasoning was erroneous for two reasons. First, plaintiff never made the claim that Hanover was a registered managing agent. Second, the unsworn HPD report is incompetent hearsay and insufficient to raise a triable factual issue on a motion for summary judgment ( see Toussaint v Ferrara Bros. Cement Mixer, 33 AD3d 991, 992).


Summaries of

Robles v. Palazzolo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 2009
66 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

In Robles v Palazzolo Realty Corp. (66 AD3d 417, 418 [1st Dept 2009]), an apartment building tenant brought an action against the landlord and landlord's president, alleging negligence in the maintenance of the apartment building.

Summary of this case from Baker v. 40 E. 80 Apartment Corp.
Case details for

Robles v. Palazzolo Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS ROBLES, Individually and as Proposed Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7148
886 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

You Qun Liu v. DMHZ Corp.

None of the acts alleged to have been committed, such as failing to inspect the premises or hiring unlicensed…

Maccabi MGMT LLC v. Cavan 2356 LLC

See Joseph Michaels v. Lispenard Holding Corp., 11 A.D.2d 12, 14, 201 N.Y.S.2d 611. And, the First Department…