From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robles v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2013
CASE NO. ED CV 13-1637-PA (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 13-1637-PA (PJW)

12-10-2013

BOBBY DIAZ ROBLES, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

________________

PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\Robles 13-1637 Order accep r&r.wpd


Summaries of

Robles v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2013
CASE NO. ED CV 13-1637-PA (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Robles v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY DIAZ ROBLES, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 13-1637-PA (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)