From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robles v. Castellanos

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Sep 24, 2021
No. 5D21-929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

5D21-929

09-24-2021

AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES, Appellant, v. LEIDY CASTELLANOS, Appellee.

Julio E. Gil De Lamadrid, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, for Appellant.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Christy Collins, Judge.

Julio E. Gil De Lamadrid, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Amir Rodriguez Robles appeals a final judgment of protection against stalking entered against her. Because she failed, after given an opportunity to do so, to provide us with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a statement of evidence approved by the trial court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robles v. Castellanos

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Sep 24, 2021
No. 5D21-929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Robles v. Castellanos

Case Details

Full title:AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES, Appellant, v. LEIDY CASTELLANOS, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

No. 5D21-929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)