From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robles v. Astrue

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Nov 22, 2010
C 10-04962 PVT (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion


LUIS M. ROBLES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant. No. C 10-04962 PVT. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. November 22, 2010.

          ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

          PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL, Magistrate Judge.

         On November 3, 2010, plaintiff Luis M. Robles applied to proceed in forma pauperis . The application identifies a monthly net income of $1,655 and monthly expenses totaling approximately $1,500. Having reviewed the application, the court orders that the case be reassigned to a district court judge and recommends that the application be granted in part and for the plaintiff to pay a portion of the $350 filing fee.


Summaries of

Robles v. Astrue

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Nov 22, 2010
C 10-04962 PVT (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Robles v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LUIS M. ROBLES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

C 10-04962 PVT (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)