From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roblero-Barrios v. Ludeman

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 5, 2008
Civil 07-4101 MJD/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Civil 07-4101 MJD/FLN.

November 5, 2008


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 8, 2008, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The DHS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (#22) and the ADA and Section 1983 claims against the DHS Defendants are dismissed with prejudice;
2. Plaintiff's ADA and Section 1983 claims against the Moose Lake Doe Defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A;
3. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against the Mercy Hospital Doe Defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
4. Plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are dismissed as moot;
5. Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Roblero-Barrios v. Ludeman

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 5, 2008
Civil 07-4101 MJD/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Roblero-Barrios v. Ludeman

Case Details

Full title:Dezeray M. Roblero-Barrios, Plaintiff, v. Cal Ludeman, Jack Erskine…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 5, 2008

Citations

Civil 07-4101 MJD/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Stop

Thus, plaintiff has failed to allege facts showing that defendant Sullentroupe or Perceil violated the…

VanHauer v. Minneapolis Police Dep't

If a plaintiff fails to state a claim, there is no need to proceed any further. See Lors, 746 F.3d at 864…