From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robledo v. Allison

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
20-cv-09134-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-09134-WHO (PR)

09-16-2021

ANTHONY J. ROBLEDO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be clearly titled as “Motion to Reopen.”

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robledo v. Allison

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
20-cv-09134-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Robledo v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. ROBLEDO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

20-cv-09134-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)